Figgipedia
Atlas variétal du figuier
FR · EN
Variety families · overview

How are the fig families related to one another?

The map of families as nodes — Clade 2

Each fig family reconstructs a lineage — and the lineages, in turn, are related. SSR characterisation (Aradhya 2010) places several of our families within a single Clade 2. This map changes scale: here, each node is a family, each edge a documented point of contact between them. Click a node to open the matching family.

parent confirmé (croisement)
parent probable
même génotype (synonyme SSR)
apparenté ADN (clade)
confusion documentée (distincts)
lien revendiqué, non testé (incertain)
tête / souche hors fiche autre famille (cliquable)
Réseau de parenté de la famille — survolez ou cliquez un nœud pour explorer ses liens.

Evidence level: ESTABLISHED genetic (SSR) · MONOGRAPH historical source · PROBABLE morphological / name-based

The core: five families, one genetic kinship

Aradhya's SSR characterisation (2010) places these five families within a single Clade 2. They are not synonyms: they are genetic cousins, each anchored to its own reference accession (DFIC, the NCGR collection in Davis). Col de Dame is the hub; the four others orbit around it. ESTABLISHED

FamilyDFICWhat it isKey synonyms (accession)
Col de Dame#74the Catalan hub, the “lady's neck” figColl de Dama, Cuello de Dama, Col di Signora (= Maho)
Negronne / Violette de Bordeaux#63the small dark fig prized by collectorsFigue de Bordeaux, Beer's Black (#277), Vista (#259)
Bourjassotte Grise#190the grey fig of south-west FranceNapolitaine, Negro Largo (#228), Violet Sepor (#210)
Verte#26the winter green figTrompe-Cassaire, Figue d'Hiver
Monstrueuse#67the large green fig of LipariIschia Green (#52), Paradiso (#307), Fico Verde (#208)

The five bridges to other families

Beyond the core, five hinge names connect Clade 2 to other families. They are not all equal: some rest on a genetic accession identity, others on a monograph, others still on a mere shared name. The “evidence” column states which, for each.

Hinge nameLinks to…What it provesEvidence
Negro Largo Brown Turkey accession #228 “Negro Largo” = #190 Bourjassotte Grise (SSR); but the name is also pinned locally onto Brown Turkey — a bridge by name, not by genes. ESTABLISHED (identity)
Cuello Dama Blanco Dottato (#66) the “Cuello Dama Blanco” of the Extremadura germplasm (CICYTEX) is in fact Kadota, by morphological and molecular characterisation (Pereira 2020). A “neck” name on a round fig. ESTABLISHED
“Similar” (Condit) Brunswick (#34) Condit (1955) considered Brunswick close to Col de Dame. An observational link, not genotyping. MONOGRAPH
Bordissotenca Bordissot Coll de Dama Bordissotenca carries a name and a morphology that straddle Coll de Dama and Bordissot. No genetic cross is documented. PROBABLE
Col di Signora Panaché the name “Col di Signora / Coll de Dama Panachée” is shared; Panaché (Striped Tiger) is attached to it by the label, with no genetic proof of kinship. PROBABLE

What is certain, what is not

Solid (genetic). The Clade 2 core and the accession identities (#228 = #190, #277 / #259 = #63, #52 / #307 = #67, Cuello Dama Blanco = Kadota) rest on SSR genotyping. ESTABLISHED

Documented, but not genotyped. The bridge to Brunswick comes from a monograph (Condit 1955); those to Bordissot and Panaché come from morphology and shared names. They are real as routes of diffusion, but they do not assert strict genetic kinship. MONO PROBABLE

Open. The deep structure of the fig is reticulate (many crossings), and many founders remain unidentified. This is a documented map of diffusion, not a strict phylogeny — and it is revised as soon as genetic evidence contradicts it. HYPOTHESIS

The ten families on the map

Some family pages are not yet available in English; those links lead to the French version for now.